Open
Conversation
we hope just get double[]. later I will add int[] too
It is useful
Closed
Collaborator
|
I like the idea, although I think it needs a little more work. For example, if we are going to implement Get methods for arrays of primitive types, it makes sense to provide them for all (GetIntArray, GetStringArray, ...). Also, a couple of things I'd like to see along with the code changes to the library:
But as I said, I like the main idea behind this, so I'll probably help you implement this when I find a little time. Thanks. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I hope GetDoubleArray ()
And later. I create int[] version too